Home | Reviews | GUIpedia | Forum | Fun500
Brandon | Fun500 ProgressToday I took the latest code, added the sidebar back, added a new log-in system, cut RAM usage by 2/3rds, and changed the no-skin look! I have a lot of work left though. | 2008-07-21 | 6:30 PM |
rCX | Re:Fun500 ProgressI'm just curious, but why did you choose the name Fun500 for you gui? | 2008-07-23 | 12:05 AM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressYeah I'm curious too. | 2008-07-23 | 12:22 AM |
Brandon | Re:Fun500 ProgressWell obviously I suck at choosing names. I used this free host called expage and it was simple. All the good names where taken and I was surprised when "Fun500" wich to me seemed easy to remember wasn't taken! I took it. Then when I needed a name for my GUI I couldn't think of anything so Fun500 it was. | 2008-07-23 | 8:00 AM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressOh yeah I remember you telling me about your Expage site one time. | 2008-07-23 | 11:27 AM |
Brandon | Re:Fun500 ProgressDAMN GOOD NEWS!!! Okay so I made a simple FB app to tell me the free RAM on my computer. It says 254. My system has 256, so 2MB is used by the DMPI and other FreeBASIC/DOS stuff. Then I added that code to the Fun500 task manager. I ran it in dos and I get 250. That means that Fun500 Hawkeye in pure MS-DOS uses 6MB At boot with one app! I opened 20 scripts (the current max (Its a constant, so I could easily change it, but I figure 20 is good)), and The ram is only upto 8MB!!! I have a AMD 486DX2 66MHz with 12MB RAM that I plan to run Fun500 on, all thats left now is to add speed. | 2008-07-23 | 11:31 AM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressAre the apps simple or complex? The more complex you get, the more RAM you need. Just don't pull a Vista. ;) | 2008-07-23 | 11:33 AM |
Brandon | Re:Fun500 Progresslol dude unforuanatly I suffer from the qb PROB were you have a lot of wasted ram space. Although the window size is dynamic(part of my space savings, in 3 all windows had 1000x1000 buffers) so with a large text editor the ram would suffer. Anyways these tests are on my development laptop that likes the resolution 1024x786 and lower ones look crappy. I tested at 640x480 and saved another MB!! So thats 5MB with one app! With 8MB you are loaded! | 2008-07-23 | 11:50 AM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressThat really sucks. I thought FB would've had better memory management modules. There's a way to kinda cheat the system with unused RAM. It's this thing I used in M-OS called "SHROOM". It stands for "SHell ROOM" (not the actual shroom). It makes a considerable difference and it will stop memory errors. | 2008-07-23 | 12:00 PM |
Brandon | Re:Fun500 ProgressHow do you use it? | 2008-07-23 | 12:03 PM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressYou run the command, "SHROOM -R FILENAME.EXE" and it'll run the "FILENAME.EXE". | 2008-07-23 | 12:09 PM |
Brandon | Re:Fun500 ProgressIt don't seem to help me | 2008-07-23 | 12:34 PM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressIf you run tons of apps, it'll help then. At least it should. I noticed the difference. | 2008-07-23 | 12:37 PM |
Brandon | Re:Fun500 ProgressIts probably cus I use FB and cus I use a scripter not many EXEs. | 2008-07-23 | 12:50 PM |
Todd | Re:Fun500 ProgressYeah that's probably the case. | 2008-07-23 | 1:05 PM |
GUIs
2021 Brandon Cornell